In what amounts to a shot across the bow of our closest ally, the U.S. fired off a threat to the U.K. This one is over our common language.
According to Secretary of State Mike Pompous, the U.S. will institute a tariff on British words—hefty enough to discourage them from reaching American shores.
The problem turns on the issue of quality.
"You invented the damn language," said Pompous. "Why can't you learn how to use it?"
The U.K.'s response was forceful but unclear. Prime Minister Theresa Maybe announced her intention to commence a "wah."
"What the hell is a "wah?" Pompous asked? "Are they going to start building a WALL or start a WAR? Even our best interpreters can't figure it out."
Statesmen aren't the only befuddled Americans. Readers, too, have long been confused by writing from across the pond.
Mary Angelica Basquirk, head of the Society of Reading Engagement (SORE), speaks for millions of U.S. readers who despair over British-isms.
"Take the words 'colour' and 'honour'—neither rhymes with 'hour.' So why do they keep the u?" she huffed. "Webster pointed this out 200 years ago, and they still don't get it."
This time it's the Brits who are ready to toss the teabags into the harbor/harbour.
"Well and good," said Hypernia Flavenburst, U.K.'s trade secretary. "No more Jane Austen for Americans. That's it. And they'll have to do without Hardy, the Brontes, and Eliot—George, that is. They can have T.S., but only because he was American."
The BBC weighed in, as well. "If Americans ever think they'll see the likes of Downton Abbey again, more's the pity," said Sir Ian Bonbon, director of licensing. "And believe me: Maggie Smith will never set foot on U.S. telly again."
Given the seriousness of Britain's response, the administration is worried about a voter backlash. A realignment is under consideration.
They'd better hurry though; the new Mary Poppins is about to open her brolly again in theaters/theatres across the country.
Cherie Belle Korteks, special to City Examiner
and LitLovers