LitBlog

LitFood

Discussion Questions
We'll add publisher questions if and when they're available; in the meantime, use our LitLovers talking points to help start a discussion for LETTERS FROM AN ASTROPHYSICIST … then take off on your own:

1. Granted the fact that your decision to read this book suggests you have a personal appreciation for, if not perhaps deep knowledge of, science. Nonetheless, has the book challenged, altered, or confirmed your understanding of science itself and/or it's importance in solving issues facing human kind?

2. Consider the criteria required for scientific theories—observation, repeatable experiments, honest discourse, peer review. Then consider how we use the word "theory" in daily parlance: "I have this theory…" or "it's just a theory…" Does Tyson do a good job of explaining the painstaking methodology that under girds our knowledge of the world versus our casual use of the word theory?

3. How does deGrasse Tyson handle the letters that denounce him personally, debunk science, or make claims regarding ghosts, UFOs, or Bigfoot?

4. (Follow-up to Question 3) How do you rate deGrasse Tyson's response to his various correspondents? Which was your favorite response? Were there some in which you think he missed the mark?

5. (Follow-up to Question 4) Which were your favorite letters sent to deGrasse Tyson. If you were to write to him, what question(s) would you want to know?

6. What nuggets of scientific knowledge surprised you most in the book?

7. How does Tyson view the relationship between science and religion? What are the differences? Do those differences rise to the level of conflict … or do the two subjects occupy completely separate realms making it impossible for one to critique the other?

8. Talk about the path Neil deGrasse Tyson took to become a scientist, starting with his youthful inspirations and mentors.

9. Degrasse Tyson says that "True science literacy is less about what you know and more about how your brain is wired for asking questions." What does he mean?

10. The author reveals a great deal about his personal philosophy, the things he loves, and his fear. Having read this collection, how would you describe him? Is he someone you would want to know or spend time with?

(Questions by LitLovers. Please feel free to use them, online and off, with attribution. Thanks.)

top of page (summary)