How to Read: Point of View Reading |
LitCourse 7 How to Read: Point of View |
1 |
The Power of Point of View The story belongs to the person who tells it—that's the power of point of view.
|
LitCourse 7 How to Read: Point of View |
2 |
The Power of Point of View See where we're going with this?
|
LitCourse 7 How to Read: Point of View |
3 |
The Power of Point of View • View of reality Same experience. Different perspective.
|
LitCourse 7 How to Read: Point of View |
4 |
The Power of Point of View We know only as much as the narrator knows . . . or chooses to tell us.
|
LitCourse 7 How to Read: Point of View |
5 |
Choosing a narrator • 1st person
• 3rd person
|
LitCourse 7 How to Read: Point of View |
6 |
Narrator—3rd person Omniscient narrator—all knowing. This narrator reveals the actions and thoughts of all characters.
Limited omniscient narrator—limited knowledge. This narrator reveals the actions and thoughts of only primary characters. Objective narrator—impersonal. This narrator reveals only the characters' actions and speech, not their inner thoughts. |
LitCourse 7 How to Read: Point of View |
7 |
Narrator—3rd person Omnisicient—we are privy to inner thoughts of all characters and identify with none in particular.
Limited Omniscient—we are privy to inner thoughts of primary characters, following them more closely and thus identifying with them over others. Objective—we have no access to inner thoughts of any characters, identifying only with those whose behavior reflects our own values. |
LitCourse 7 How to Read: Point of View |
8 |
Narrator—1st person |
LitCourse 7 How to Read: Point of View |
9 |
Narrator—1st person • may have a vested interest in presenting a particular version of the truth, or partial truth.
• may be out of the loop, knowing only part of the truth. Readers can know only as much as the "I" in the story knows—or chooses to tell us. |
LitCourse 7 How to Read: Point of View |
10 |
Point of view—an experiment • Course 1—"The Story of an Hour" |
LitCourse 7 How to Read: Point of View |
11 |
Point of view—experiment 1 "The Stor of an Hour"—as told in the 1st person by Josephine: "I lingered outside the bedroom door but heard no weeping. After nearly an hour, the door opened, and Louise stepped out. It was most strange, for about her face was a hard, flinty, almost triumphant look. Could my dear sister-in-law be so cold-hearted as to find joy in her husband's death?"
Result: without a limited omniscient narrator, who takes us inside Mrs. Mallard, we would condemn her as cold and uncaring. And we would miss the irony of her death. |
LitCourse 7 How to Read: Point of View |
12 |
Point of view—experiment 2 "A Rose for Emily"—as told through a limited omniscient narrator: we would be privy to Emily's inner thoughts, her grief over her father's death; later, her feelings about homer and anger at his leaving. Emily would be humanized—lessening the richness and complexity of the story. Both the mystery and humor (the smell and men pouring lime around the house) would disappear.
Result: without the collective 1st person "we" of the community, we would be unable to detect the town's hypocrisy and pettiness—and its complicity in Emily's downfall. |
LitCourse 7 How to Read: Point of View |
13 |
Point of view—experiment 3 "A & P"—with an objective narrator: Sammy would be nothing more than a smart-mouthed kid. His inner voice is what gives the story its humor and meaning: "sheep" combing the aisles, the "witch" at the register, the sexual excitement the girls provoke, and the class differences Sammy feels. Because Sammy speaks to us, we understand his frustration.
Result: absent Sammy's voice, we would miss the thematic last lines, his coming-of-age epiphany—that the world is a hard place for creative souls or for those who take a hard, fast stand on principle. |
LitCourse 7 How to Read: Point of View |
14 |
Point of view—experiment 3 "Babylon Revisited" as narrated by Marion: "Oh my lord. What's he doing here? He's ruined so many lives, the bastard. Once a drunk, always a drunk. He thinks he can waltz in here and take Honoria away from us? He has no idea how to be a decent father...I've see his kind of "caring." He would endanger Honoria's life, like he did my sister's. For her sake, I can't let Charles take her daughter.
Result: we would miss the story's complexity—Marion's manipulative qualities, Honoria's revealing lunch with her father, and the possibility that Charles is worthy of reclaiming his honor and life. |
LitCourse 7 How to Read: Point of View |
15 |
Congratulations! "Why I live at the P.O." |